the conversation In just the month of October in France, a 67-year-old woman
died in Brittany, a 33-year-old mother and her two children were
shot in the legs in the Rhône region, and a 62-year-old mushroom picker was
shot in the abdomen and had to be helicoptered to Marseille.
The link between these gruesome incidents? They were all caused by careless hunters.
All the more timely, then, is the French Senate’s report released in September, which called for a
ban on alcohol and narcotics while hunting alongside for a spate of
measures similar to those applied to drink-driving. On 25 October, the government released a
policy roadmap comprising some of these suggestions, including restrictions on drinking. “Hunting involves an arm. Like driving, it is not compatible with a high blood-alcohol concentration,” the secretary of state for ecology, Bérangère Couillard, said. The Elysee is now awaiting to hear feedback from hunting federations with the view to formulating decrees by early 2023 at the latest.
The French hunting chief’s remark would not hold water in other countries, where representative organisations advise hunters to abstain from alcohol. Absent an EU-wide legislation on the matter, national legislation in states such as
Spain,
Belgium and
Germany restrict drinking while in possession of a firearm. Or take, for example, the official website of
a US agency for hunting education, which states that
“consuming alcohol before or during the hunt increases the risk of incidents because it impairs coordination, hearing, vision, communication, and judgement”.
This may seem like common-sense advice, but alcohol is still integral to the world of hunting, both in France and farther afield.
Hunting while drunk
In the United States, where the general population consumes
20% less alcohol than in France, a
recent survey carried out on a representative sample of 2,349 young adults found that 23% of male hunters had at some point hunted while inebriated.
And in France? Although there is an absence of hard data, the Senate report tentatively ventures that a “small minority” of people have hunted while under the influence of alcohol. However, the senators offer more precise statistics regarding deaths and serious accidents in hunting, 9% of which are attributable to a hunter’s state of inebriation.
Moreover, the recent Senate report does not clarify how alcohol significantly raises the risk of accidents. But we have managed to pinpoint three contributing effects of inebriation.
Locomotion and motor coordination
A study conducted at a Swiss A&E service showed a third of the hunting-related injuries there resulted from falls – for example,
when shooters tumbled from tree-stands. Alcohol is conducive to this type of incident, particularly by interfering with the
inner ear and cerebellum, which regulate balance. This has a negative impact on the hunter’s anticipation and motor coordination skills.
Other
research demonstrated that when individuals were instructed to avoid obstacles while walking on a treadmill, their reaction times were significantly longer, even at low levels of alcohol intake.
Visual and hearing impairment
Alcohol also impairs peripheral vision, thus affecting judgement and accuracy in angles of fire. This is what causes double vision and
blurred vision, by disturbing the action of muscles that control visual focus. It enhances
glaring, by slowing down the muscles responsible for opening and closing the pupil in response to surrounding light levels.
Alcohol even
deteriorates our hearing. In one study, subjects who had consumed alcohol were found to have significantly poorer hearing abilities compared to those who had not.
Errors of judgement
Once the extent of alcohol’s effects on sight and hearing are better understood, the range of stories that pop up in local newspapers – such as the man who ended up
riddled with buckshot when his hunting companion mistook him for a hare – become less of a surprise.
Drinking makes for riskier decision-making
The choice of whether to pull the trigger or hold fire is dependent on another dimension. According to the Senate report:
“More than two thirds of accidents result from gross misconduct that contravenes basic safety rules. Moreover, some one hundred incidents per year lead to devastating consequences, whereby shots are fired at vehicles or homes.”
A 2015 study demonstrated this effect using a straightforward method, which involved presenting two jars filled with cards to bar patrons, aged 18 to 43. The subjects were told that they could earn a prize if they found a winning card. In the jar on the right, 50% of the cards were winners, whereas the probability of winning was not given for the jar on the left. The results showed that the drunk men (but not the women)
more often chose the riskier option. Could this be likened to the scenario of taking a shot in the dark in the hopes of hitting a target?
A major factor in human aggression
Of course, it’s not alcohol but hunters who have
shot 400 people dead in the past two decades in France and injured thousands more. (And it should be noted that alcohol is responsible for
almost a million deaths in instances not related to hunting).
Given that alcohol has clearly been identified as an avoidable risk factor, however, it seems wise to ban its consumption for those using rifles and shotguns in woodland areas frequented by the public. When consuming alcohol, hunters threaten the lives of others, and their own as well.
These soldiers are from a country whose president is a Jew Zelensky. Orthodox churches are also being destroyed in this country. Synagogues are not touched. Surprisingly, it turns out that Jews get along well with the Bandera Nazis.